The trademark Arena was filed by ISB Magma Limited, a corporation established under the laws of the Republic of Malta (the "Applicant"). The application was published for oppositions on June 13, 2022, and received undefined oppositions.
Opposition Proceedings
There are undefined oppositions were filed:
The first opposition filed on September 13, 2022 by NCSOFT Corporation on (a) Likelihood of confusion, (b) Unfair advantage and detriment to distinctiveness or repute. the opponent was represented by NOERR ALICANTE IP, S.L. and its proceedings were handled in English
The second opposition filed on September 11, 2022 by FORKADE FADEEV, SERGEY on (a) Identity of marks and Goods and Services, (b) Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by BERMEJO & JACOBSEN PATENTES-MARCAS S.L. and its proceedings were handled in English
The third opposition filed on September 8, 2022 by HOTEL ARENA B.V. on (a) Identity of marks and Goods and Services, (b) Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by DE MERKPLAATS B.V. and its proceedings were handled in English
The fourth opposition filed on September 4, 2022 by ARENA S.P.A. on Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by Rousseau, Sylvain and its proceedings were handled in IT
The fifth opposition filed on August 29, 2022 by Eschenbach Optik GmbH on (a) Identity of marks and Goods and Services, (b) Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by WOLPERT RECHTSANWÄLTE and its proceedings were handled in English
The sixth opposition filed on August 24, 2022 by Arena Verlag GmbH on (a) Identity of marks and Goods and Services, (b) Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by PARTSCH & PARTNER RECHTSANWÄLTE and its proceedings were handled in English
The seventh opposition filed on August 22, 2022 by ARENA GREEN POWER, S.L. on Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by ROEB Y CIA, S.L. and its proceedings were handled in English
The eighth opposition filed on July 7, 2022 by Varitelia Distribuciones on Likelihood of confusion. the opponent was represented by IPAMARK S.L. and its proceedings were handled in English
The application was filed in English, and English was also language of all opposition proceedings (Italian was selected as the second language).
Goods And Services
The mark was filed in class 9 with following description of goods:
Apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity
Diving equipment
Information technology and audio-visual, multimedia and photographic devices
Magnets, magnetizers and demagnetizers
Measuring, detecting, monitoring and controlling devices
Navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices
Optical devices, enhancers and correctors
Recorded content
Safety, security, protection and signalling devices
Scientific and laboratory devices for treatment using electricity
Scientific research and laboratory apparatus, educational apparatus and simulators..
The mark was filed in class 28 with Toys, games, and playthings and all of the aforesaid being for and in relation to games of chance, betting games, games displaying wagers, casino games, gambling games..
The mark was filed in class 35 with Advertising, marketing and promotional services and Business assistance, management and administrative services...
The mark was filed in class 38 with Provision and rental of telecommunications facilities and equipment and Telecommunication services...
The mark was filed in class 41 with following description of goods:
Education, entertainment and sport services
Publishing, reporting, and writing of texts
Ticket reservation and booking services for education, entertainment and sports activities and events
Translation and interpretation
Education, entertainment and sports..
The mark was filed in class 42 with following description of goods: